Well, in any art there are a lot of technical things that you can get to like.

In terms of existing, everything is equal.

Pollock looks unusual and radical even now.

If a chair or a building is not functional, if it appears to be only art, it is ridiculous.

Actual space is intrinsically more powerful and specific than paint on a flat surface.

The attitude and capacity of the factory, the old metal table and the new ideas of the wooden furniture quickly and naturally suggested the possibility of metal furniture.

You’re getting rid of the things that people used to think were essential to art. But that reduction is only incidental. I object to the whole reduction idea…if my work is reductionist it’s because it doesn’t have the elements that people thought should be there. But it has other elements I like.