The secret of the Internet's success has been its openness to new services.

Growth comes out of a healthy competitive atmosphere, not trying to choose a particular path forward.

The problem - when you cast your net that wide - is you inevitably catch something you don't want to catch.

Vigorous enforcement of copyrights themselves is an important part of the picture. But I don't think that expanding the legal definition of copyright outside of actual copyright infringement is the right move.

Innovation happens because there are people out there doing and trying a lot of different things.

Given a choice between dancing pigs and security, users will pick dancing pigs every time.

And the user may have a higher comfort level deciding what information to provide rather than worrying about what inferences might be made from what they've gathered.