What some of the early horror genre masters knew, and what I know, is that the audience are perverts, but in the best possible way.

That's kind of my ideal sequel - a movie that continues the story, takes one character and moves on, and moves forward with that character that survived with the first one.

There's so much stuff going on behind the cameras. Sometimes people think these things are done certain ways and when you watch that you see how hard and down and dirty it was.

What some of the early horror genre masters knew, and what I know, is that the audience are perverts, but in the best possible way.

I think violence in movies, for it to work, you have to use it smartly. People get numb very fast. If you have too much violence in the beginning, it gets to a point where you don't feel it.

You can make a film with a phone and a computer if you want, if you have the time. So it's a world that is saturated with films and all kind of stuff, so it's such a blessing to be able to make a film and people care, and even if they say that it's a bad idea, at least they care and they're talking about it.

If you think about it, a lot of great horror films have bad sequels just because the market demands you to make the other one right away.