So much of what we are currently seeing as far as human suffering and misery comes from diseases that should have been preventable but were not.

As a scientist, you're not supposed to make decisions without the data.

Are we using science in ways that it wasn't intended to, in which case we should be a little careful, or are we using faith in ways that faith wasn't really designed for? There are certain questions that are better answered by one approach than the other, and if you start mixing that up, then you end up in ... conflict.

By investigating God's majestic and awesome creation, science can actually be a means of worship.

If God made the natural laws, why could he not violate them when it was a particularly significant moment for him to do so? And if you accept the idea that Christ was also divine, which I do, then his Resurrection is not in itself a great logical leap.

Science's domain is the natural. If you want to understand the natural world and be sure you're not misleading yourself, science is the way to do it.

God is an awesome mathematician and physicist.