I said the photograph isn't what was photographed, it's something else. It's about transformation. And that's what it is.

Aside from women, I don't know. My work doesn't function the way Robert Frank's did.

I'm shocked that I can live pretty well, or reasonably, or make a certain amount of my living, anyway, off of prints. I guess it's nuts. I don't believe in it. I never anticipated it; I still don't believe it.

I have no idea what's going to happen. Who knows - if they can't afford to buy a boat, maybe they buy a print. Who knows what happens with their buck?

In the end, maybe the correct language would be how the fact of putting four edges around a collection of information or facts transforms it. A photograph is not what was photographed, it's something else.

Sometimes photographers mistake emotion for what makes a great street photograph.

I develop my own film. And I work in spurts. I pile it up.