I said the photograph isn't what was photographed, it's something else. It's about transformation. And that's what it is.

Museum of Modern Art doesn't have anything to do with what I do. Probably has made some differences in my sales, I wouldn't be surprised. Again, you have to ask other people, because I don't have a measuring device.

Photography is not about the thing photographed. It is about how that thing looks photographed.

I generally deal with something happening.

I was able to work with two heads. If anything, doing ads and other commercial work were at least exercises in discipline.

[Photography is ] likewise even French impressionists. So the Sculls bought pop. It was politics, and they moved with it. And I think that could be happening, to some degree, with photography, too. It doesn't cost as much to do it, either.

There's all kinds of people teaching who don't do anything worth a nickel. Likewise in advertising.