I'm talking about technical goofs. I'm pretty much on top of it. The kind of picture you're referring to would have to be more about the effects of technical things, technical phenomena, and I'm just not interested in that kind of work at all.

Photography is not about the thing photographed. It is about how that thing looks photographed.

What you photograph is responsible for how a photograph looks - the form, the design, whatever word you want to use.

If I photograph you I don't have you, I have a photograph of you. It's got its own thing. That's really what photography, still photography, is about.

Sometimes photographers mistake emotion for what makes a great street photograph.

The primary problem is to learn to be your own toughest critic. You have to pay attention to intelligent work, and to work at the same time. You see. I mean, you’ve got to bounce off better work. It’s matter of working.

There's an arbitrary idea that the horizontal edge in a frame has to be the point of reference.