In the end, maybe the correct language would be how the fact of putting four edges around a collection of information or facts transforms it. A photograph is not what was photographed, it's something else.

For me anyway when a photograph is interesting, it's interesting because of the kind of photographic problem it states - which has to do with the contest between content and form.

I think that there isn't a photograph in the world that has any narrative ability... They do not tell stories - they show you what something looks like. To a camera.

I have to photograph where I am.

Photography is about finding out what can happen in the frame. When you put four edges around some facts, you change those facts.

I develop my own film. And I work in spurts. I pile it up.

If you run into a monkey in some idiot context, automatically you've got a very real problem taking place in the photograph.