The whole dimension of religious belief requires transcendence, it requires going beyond what you can establish rationally.

In a very real sense my science does inform my knowledge of God. If you would allow me to say that we never know God, because if I claim that I know God, I know something other than God, because God is not knowable, he is unknowable. So we have to approach it in that sense first, that my knowledge of God is always limited.

Being a scientist helps to support both my life as a Jesuit and my belief in God.

People tend not to disassociate the technological issues from pure scientific research, so that science sometimes gets a bad name for things that science doesn't deserve having a bad name for.

Neither of us can come to either a knowledge of God, or a denial of God by our scientific research.

Scientists in general tend to have what I would call a bit of hubris that the public do not necessarily understand. So scientists some times make claims that are misunderstood by the public.

I don't use scientific data as a foundation for believing in God - I use it as an enrichment of my knowledge of God.