I don't see any need to unduly burden the taxpayer.

There are several ways in order to reduce the housing problem.One way is to allow a developer to buy land more cheaply if it's in an outlying area.

I'm not an expert in it, but it seems to me that you have to let the market forces go their course.

It seems to me that it's better to allow people to have more spendable income.That helps 'LO stimulate the economy and create more jobs.

My understanding has always been that if there is any indication that pesticides are harmful, that they would not be allowed to be used.

One of course is to insure greater supply of energy for California's needs now and in the future in the sense that we are in discussions with representatives of Oregon and Washington, where they do have a surplus supply of energy available, and at what we hope will be a very reasonable price.

I don't see any need to unduly burden the taxpayer.