I don't see any need to unduly burden the taxpayer.

The difference between golf and government is that in golf you can't improve your lie.

We're looking at available sources, all sources, in the area of additional energy.

One of course is to insure greater supply of energy for California's needs now and in the future in the sense that we are in discussions with representatives of Oregon and Washington, where they do have a surplus supply of energy available, and at what we hope will be a very reasonable price.

There are several ways in order to reduce the housing problem.One way is to allow a developer to buy land more cheaply if it's in an outlying area.

My understanding has always been that if there is any indication that pesticides are harmful, that they would not be allowed to be used.

I don't see any need to unduly burden the taxpayer.