My understanding has always been that if there is any indication that pesticides are harmful, that they would not be allowed to be used.

There are several ways in order to reduce the housing problem.One way is to allow a developer to buy land more cheaply if it's in an outlying area.

There does need to be a speed-up of the process.It takes entirely too long to addres5 some of those concerns and, in the process, it becomes so extremely expensive and cumbersome that it tends to turn away those people and companies that want to provide much needed housing.

I don't see any need to unduly burden the taxpayer.

I'm not an expert in it, but it seems to me that you have to let the market forces go their course.

My understanding has always been that if there is any indication that pesticides are harmful, that they would not be allowed to be used.

Every lie has 2 parts - the lie we tell others and the one we tell ourselves to justify it.