My understanding has always been that if there is any indication that pesticides are harmful, that they would not be allowed to be used.

I'm not an expert in it, but it seems to me that you have to let the market forces go their course.

We're looking at available sources, all sources, in the area of additional energy.

It seems to me that it's better to allow people to have more spendable income.That helps 'LO stimulate the economy and create more jobs.

I don't see any need to unduly burden the taxpayer.

One of course is to insure greater supply of energy for California's needs now and in the future in the sense that we are in discussions with representatives of Oregon and Washington, where they do have a surplus supply of energy available, and at what we hope will be a very reasonable price.

One of the biggest problems that we have right now is that in some areas of the State we cannot get additional jobs created because they say the housing costs are too high.