One definition of the wicked is that they will resort to whatever means are necessary to achieve their ends. Therefore, if those who oppose wickedness don't learn the art of war, they will be helpless.

Success looks like you sitting here pretty confident that an armed brigade isn't going to come pouring in here and blow your head off. Which I don't think is your major concern. Therefore, the United States' foreign policy is successful.

The man who hates war more than he hates the Nazis is a wicked man.

The warrior must continue to make decisions in the face of extreme circumstances. He cannot afford to get angry or frightened.

The kind of president we need has little to do with ideology and more to do with a willingness to wield power to moral ends.

In a way, we can have a much easier discussion about the future of technology than we can about why a young man kills another man in a war.

When you have the countries like Germany, China, and Russia decline, and be replaced by others, that's when systemic wars start. That's when it gets dangerous, because they haven't yet reached a balance. So Germany united in 1871 and all hell broke loose. Japan rose in the early 20th century, and then you had chaos. So we're looking at a systemic shift. Be ready for war.