Who takes the blame: the leader who talks of poverty but lives in luxury, or the poor who choose a leader of that type?

Existentialist philosophy recognizes the existence of the individual as the real purpose of human life. The recognition is basically atheistic and it encourages the individual to free himself from the impositions of custom, governmental authority, economic pressures, and cultural inhibitions.

Positive secularism is not tolerance of all religions, but it is the total denial of religious beliefs: it is the emergence of homogeneous human outlook which is based upon verifiable facts of life.

Hallucinations and illusions are not facts useful for scientific investigation.

Who takes the blame: the leader who talks of poverty but lives in luxury, or the poor who choose a leader of that type?

The insistence on truthfulness does not disturb the freedom of the individual. The social obligation implied in Satyagraha turns the freedom of the individual into moral freedom. An atheist is free to say or to do what he likes, provided he does what he says and says what he does. So, in the context of social relations, the freedom of the individual is moral freedom.

Real morality is possible when the sanctions for morality are also tangible and real.