Right wins only when we dare and act.

The love of individual freedom has stood in the way of the appreciation of social obligations.

Hallucinations and illusions are not facts useful for scientific investigation.

The insistence on truthfulness does not disturb the freedom of the individual. The social obligation implied in Satyagraha turns the freedom of the individual into moral freedom. An atheist is free to say or to do what he likes, provided he does what he says and says what he does. So, in the context of social relations, the freedom of the individual is moral freedom.

Satyagraha means insistence on what one knows to be the truth. The insistence implies the exercise of free will as the need of social obligation. If one is content to know the truth himself, he does not become a votary of Satyagraha. A Satyagrahi should not only know the truth but should insist upon it in social relations. So Satyagraha is activation of truthfulness.

Who takes the blame: the leader who talks of poverty but lives in luxury, or the poor who choose a leader of that type?

Right wins only when we dare and act.