If I know you're very good in music, I can predict with just about zero accuracy whether you're going to be good or bad in other things.

I think that any important educational goal can be realized via several routes.

I reject the notion that human beings have a single intelligence, which can be drawn on for the full range of problem solving.

Best of all, persons can sometimes be app-transcendent: making dramatic progress or discoveries, without any dependence on any app. In this context, I like to mention Steve Jobs. While he had as much to do as anyone with the invention and development of apps, he NEVER was limited by the current technology - indeed, he typically transcended it and relied on his own considerable wits.

Part of the maturity of the sciences is an appreciation of which questions are best left to other disciplinary approaches.

I don't think that it is necessary to rethink curricular goals. But it is certainly worth thinking about whether these goals can be reached in multiple ways.

While I’ve worked on many topics and written many books, I have not abandoned my interest in multiple intelligences.