2D looks so flat. Well, it is, of course, it's flat. But 3D isn't. And for an adventure story that takes you into a long-distant, fictional world, it's ideal, I think.

Some directors don't tell you that it's not your fault, so you get increasingly depressed that you're not delivering what's required, and then you discover it's not you at all, it's something in the background that's out of focus.

Every anti-gay remark from the Church gives the thug a license to be cruel.

As for the clarity of the 48 frames, I've heard people say that it looks odd, it's too demanding, there's too much information, you don't know where to look.

My reaction to 3D is subtly. Things don't come out at you, but rather you - The audience come into the film.

No one needs to feel sorry for me or anyone else who has fallen victim to success.

I think I'm a bit gruffer than I used to be, and I'm certainly older.