Yet it would be unfair to the generality of our kind to ascribe to their intellectual and moral weakness the gradual divergence of Buddhism and Christianity from their primitive patterns. For it should not be forgotten that by their glorification of poverty and celibacy both these religions struck straight at the root not merely of civil society but of human existence. The blow was parried by the wisdom or the folly of the vast majority of mankind, who refused to purchase a chance of saving their souls with the certainty of extinguishing the species.

The world cannot live at the level of its great men.

Some of the old laws of Israel are clearly savage taboos of a familiar type thinly disguised as commands of the Deity.

It is a common rule with primitive people not to waken a sleeper, because his soul is away and might not have time to get back.

The moral world is as little exempt as the physical world from the law of ceaseless change, of perpetual flux.

The man of science, like the man of letters, is too apt to view mankind only in the abstract, selecting in his consideration only a single side of our complex and many-sided being.

By religion, then, I understand a propitiation or conciliation of powers superior to man which are believed to direct and control the course of nature and of human life.