We don't have faith in reason; we use reason because, unlike revelation, it produces results and understanding. Even discussing why we should use reason employs reason!

Faith is a padlock of the mind, and few keys can open it.

If you can't think of an observation that could disprove a theory, that theory simply isn't scientific.

These mysteries about how we evolved should not distract us from the indisputable fact that we did evolve.

It takes a profound hypocrisy to try to reconcile for others things that you can't reconcile for yourself.

Science has only two things to contribute to religion: an analysis of the evolutionary, cultural, and psychological basis for believing things that aren't true, and a scientific disproof of some of faith's claims (e.g., Adam and Eve, the Great Flood). Religion has nothing to contribute to science, and science is best off staying as far away from faith as possible. The "constructive dialogue" between science and faith is, in reality, a destructive monologue, with science making all the good points, tearing down religion in the process.

Some believers are fundamentalists about everything, but every believer is a fundamentalist about something.