Science has only two things to contribute to religion: an analysis of the evolutionary, cultural, and psychological basis for believing things that aren't true, and a scientific disproof of some of faith's claims (e.g., Adam and Eve, the Great Flood). Religion has nothing to contribute to science, and science is best off staying as far away from faith as possible. The "constructive dialogue" between science and faith is, in reality, a destructive monologue, with science making all the good points, tearing down religion in the process.

The fact that both Jews and Christians ignore some of God's or Jesus's commands, but scrupulously obey others, is absolute proof that people pick and choose their morality not on the basis of its divine source, but because it comports with some innate morality that they derived from other sources.

In the end theologians are jealous of science, for they are aware that it has greater authority than do their own ways of finding "truth": dogma, authority, and revelation. Science does find truth, faith does not.

The battle for evolution seems never-ending. And the battle is part of a wider war, a war between rationality and superstition.

Religion is based on dogma and belief, whereas science is based on doubt and questioning.

It takes a profound hypocrisy to try to reconcile for others things that you can't reconcile for yourself.

Damn, but science is just a constant feed of cool new facts and theories. Theology doesn't come close.