I think architecture could be understood as the construction of realities, or the construction of worlds.

When I would present my work as a student, often I would hear, "Your project is too formal" - it's too form-based; it's too form-driven. Which is kind of shocking for a visual practice, for someone to say something discouraging about a focus on an exploration of aesthetics.

Setting up absurd worlds with rules to violate - it's one of the things I hope to achieve with my work.

It is possible to construct small realities that contain political or philosophical responses, not necessarily just practical or economical responses.

I believe architecture is a cultural output and I think Rem Koolhaas is one of the rare individuals who was able to really output architecture as cultural artifact.

One of the reasons why architects are often attracted to philosophers, partially, has to do with making sense of the world around us as well as the making of worlds.

The world is meaningless and therefore it's funny.