If I were to arrive at a foreign country like Czech Republic, I don't have to speak Czech to understand the feeling of the local sensations through architecture. That is a kind of communication that no language can perform.

The diagram of the house is a portrait of the family, a true portrait, whether it's sad or happy.

Unlike sciences, literature as art relies on societal acceptance of a certain vocabulary.

Many artists I enjoy have a large body of work, and eventually the message is derived out from the sum of its parts.

In 500 years, English has changed a lot, and right now we're undergoing an extremely rapid rate of accelerated advancement in terms of technology, but I still have a hard time believing that we're going to stop speaking to each other. The role of architecture, in terms of communication, is not going to drastically change either. It's going to continue to create a cultural affect where people will be able to understand something beyond function that may otherwise be foreign to them.

Architecture, in itself, at the end of the day, is a rational profession.

In order for architecture to experience its ongoing evolution as a language, there has to be a lot of adjusted copies between how architects draw, think, engage bylaws and constraints.