The world is meaningless and therefore it's funny.

As a visual discourse, architecture requires trained individuals to work on the refined philosophical debates. School gave me the necessary training, and I've built on this based on my own aesthetics, as most do.

Morphology happens over time. It's not necessarily a bad thing.

The role of architecture, in terms of communication, is not going to drastically change either.

I believe architecture is a cultural output and I think Rem Koolhaas is one of the rare individuals who was able to really output architecture as cultural artifact.

What's interesting in archaeology is that we always understand other cultures by digging up their cities; architecture is almost always a way for us to formulate a diagram of how people used to live.

The world is meaningless and therefore it's funny.