Thus I assume that to each according to his threat advantage is not a conception of justice.

An injustice is tolerable only when it is necessary to avoid an even greater injustice.

Ideally a just constitution would be a just procedure arranged to insure a just outcome.

A comprehensive doctrine, either religious or secular, aspires to cover all of life. I mean, if it's a religious doctrine, it talks about our relation to God and the universe; it has an ordering of all the virtues, not only political virtues but moral virtues as well, including the virtues of private life, and the rest. Now we may feel philosophically that it doesn't really cover everything, but it aims to cover everything, and a secular doctrine does also.

Justice is the first virtue of social institutions.

It is of first importance that the military be subordinate to civilian government

Citizens can have their own grounding in their comprehensive doctrines, whatever they happen to be.