Anything can be art. Art is the relations between relations, not the relations between objects.

When objects are presented within the context of art (and until recently objects always have been used) they are as eligible for aesthetic consideration as are any objects in the world, and an aesthetic consideration of an object existing in the realm of art means that the object's existence or functioning in an art context is irrelevant to the aesthetic judgment.

Anything can be art. Art is the relations between relations, not the relations between objects.

That celebrated marriage of science and art, photography, seemed at the time to join together how we look at the world, art, with how we were coming to know it, science.

Making something new to look at is a futile and empty act if its only audience is the eyes.

Seeing is not as simple as looking.

I am only describing language, not explaining anything.