This movement is not about the destruction of law, but the construction of law.

I always believed that WikiLeaks as a concept would perform a global role, and to some degree it was clear that it was doing that as far back as 2007 when it changed the result of the Kenyan general election.

The internet, our greatest tool of emancipation, has been transformed into the most dangerous facilitator of totalitarianism we have ever seen. The internet is a threat to human civilization.

Let's say that, personally, I loved Hillary Clinton. Would WikiLeaks still publish this material? Of course it would. Otherwise, we would be censoring it. That's our mandate. It's actually interesting to think about what media organizations wouldn't publish such material if it was given to them.

I don't like the word transparency; cold dead glass is transparent. I prefer education or understanding, which are more human.

Every time we witness an act that we feel to be unjust and do not act, we become a party to injustice.

As always, most media aligns with the presumptive winner even though their claimed societal virtue is to investigate those in power.