There is still the illusion that if we could declare corporations are not people or that money is not speech, all would be solved. Regardless of the good in those ideas, it wouldn't.

Show me why your regulation of culture is needed. Show me how it does good. And until you can show me both, keep your lawyers away.

I think the archaic idea is actually winner take all, because the principle of "one person, one vote" is a principle that was introduced as a fundamental principle in American law in 1962, long after states had moved to "one person, one vote."

While appropriation art is critical to art, it's an ambiguous art form in the world of the Supreme Court.

The popular choice, by more than 2 million votes, is a completely qualified candidate for president.

[Congress] and their cronies secure more than one hundred billion dollars in corporate welfare

Now that copyrights can be just about a century long, the inability to know what is protected and what is not protected becomes a huge and obvious burden on the creative process.