In open source, we feel strongly that to really do something well, you have to get a lot of people involved.

I don't think commercialization is the answer to anything. It's just one more facet of Linux, and not the deciding one by any means.

See, you not only have to be a good coder to create a system like Linux, you have to be a sneaky bastard too.

I don't try to be a threat to MicroSoft, mainly because I don't really see MS as competition. Especially not Windows-the goals of Linux and Windows are simply so different.

Non-technical questions sometimes don't have an answer at all.

I never felt that the naming issue was all that important, but I was obviously wrong, judging by how many people felt. I tell people to call it just plain Linux and nothing more.

It's what I call "mental masturbation", when you engage is some pointless intellectual exercise that has no possible meaning.