And to imagine a language means to imagine a form of life.

It is so characteristic, that just when the mechanics of reproduction are so vastly improved, there are fewer and fewer people who know how the music should be played.

We are asleep. Our Life is a dream. But we wake up sometimes, just enough to know that we are dreaming.

Only a man who lives not in time but in the present is happy.

In order to be able to set a limit to thought, we should have to find both sides of the limit thinkable (i.e. we should have to be able to think what cannot be thought).

Could one imagine a stone's having consciousness? And if anyone can do so-why should that not merely prove that such image-mongery is of no interest to us?

Nothing is more important for teaching us to understand the concepts we have than to construct fictitious ones.