One of the most misleading representational techniques in our language is the use of the word 'I.'

I give no sources, because it is indifferent to me whether what I have thought has already been thought before me by another.

Here the term 'language-game' is meant to bring into prominence the fact that the speaking of language is part of an activity, of a form of life.

It is love that believes the resurrection.

Architecture immortalizes and glorifies something. Hence there can be no architecture where there is nothing to glorify.

It would strike me as ridiculous to want to doubt the existence of Napoleon; but if someone doubted the existence of the earth 150years ago, perhaps I should be more willing to listen, for now he is doubting our whole system of evidence.

In order to be able to set a limit to thought, we should have to find both sides of the limit thinkable (i.e. we should have to be able to think what cannot be thought).