Language disguises thought.

Only a man who lives not in time but in the present is happy.

We could present spatially an atomic fact which contradicted the laws of physics, but not one which contradicted the laws of geometry.

Is it even always an advantage to replace an indistinct picture by a sharp one? Isn't the indistinct one often what we need?

I'm doing philosophy like an old woman, first I'm looking for my pencil, then I'm looking for my glasses, then I'm looking for my pencil again.

Don't get involved in partial problems, but always take flight to where there is a free view over the whole single great problem, even if this view is still not a clear one.

We find certains things about seeing puzzling, because we do not find the whole business of seeing puzzling enough.