Philosophy limits the thinkable and therefore the unthinkable.

This procedure [selecting the simplest law], however, has no logical justification but only a psychological one.

The so-called law of induction cannot possibly be a law of logic, since it is obviously a proposition with a sense.--Nor, therefore, can it be an a priori law.

It is obvious that an imagined #‎ world , however different it may be from the real one, must have something - a form - in common with it.

The truth of the thoughts that are here set forth seems to me unassailable and definitive. I therefore believe myself to have found, on all essential points, the final solution of the problems. And if I am not mistaken in this belief, then the second thing in which the value of this work consists is that it shows how little is achieved when these problems are solved.

You get tragedy where the tree, instead of bending, breaks.

Language disguises thought.