Is it even always an advantage to replace an indistinct picture by a sharp one? Isn't the indistinct one often what we need?

There are, indeed, things that cannot be put into words. They make themselves manifest. They are what is mystical.

And to imagine a language means to imagine a form of life.

In order to draw a limit to thinking, we should have to think both sides of this limit.

If a lion could talk, we could not understand him.

If we spoke a different language, we would perceive a somewhat different world.

It is a dogma of the Roman Church that the existence of God can be proved by natural reason. Now this dogma would make it impossible for me to be a Roman Catholic. If I thought of God as another being like myself, outside myself, only infinitely more powerful, then I would regard it as my duty to defy him.