What's better, a poetic intuition or an intellectual work? I think they complement each other.

My pleasure was to copy, not to create.

If the novelist shares his or her problems with the characters, he or she is able to study his personal unconscious.

The writer needs to react to his or her own internal universe, to his or her own point of view. If he or she doesn't have a personal point of view, it's impossible to be a creator.

Modern American cinema seems to me superficial. The intention is to understand a certain reality, and the result is nothing but a photographing of that reality.

I can work in films as long as the story doesn't have a realistic nature. If I'm working with an allegory, a fantasy, it can be developed in synthetic terms.

I am only interested in bad taste if I can enjoy a gruesome tango or watch a movie that makes me cry.