Be able to tell whether garments that look good on the hanger actually look good on you

Know how to garnish food so that it is more appealing to the eye and even more flavorful than before.

Know what happens when an individual declares bankruptcy and how it affects his or her life.

Society needs people who can manage projects in addition to handling individual tasks.

Know how weather, especially humidity, can affect the movement of doors and windows.

Scientists and creationists are always at odds, of course.

Yes. The original argument is defective. Substitute the word 'male' for 'gay,' and you'll see the flaw: 'Male people cannot be normal. If everyone were male starting tomorrow, the human race would die out, so being male cannot be nature's intended way.' Or you could substitute the word 'female.' In either case, the argument makes no sense: Being male or female is perfectly normal.