There is a continuum between science and philosophy. As Fichte said (but did not practice), philosophy should be the science of sciences.

Communication accompanies social transactions and can instruct or stultify, mobilize or intimidate, but it is no substitute for production, collaboration and fight.

One can discern a few very general myths that facilitate the birth of further myths: that everything is possible; that whatever we have failed to explain in normal and earthly terms must have paranormal or supernatural explanations; and that science, being rational, cannot explain the irrational, such as taste and love.

One should believe only what can be chosen to be true or just. Irrational (or unjustified) beliefs should be avoided because they can have disastrous practical consequences.

I believe that modern science supports free will, in showing that the brain can act spontaneously, not only in response to external stimuli.

Science is morally neutral, but social science shows us that some moral codes are better than others.

Only the stupid and the wicked can fear rational criticism.