In the scientific community you find competent teachers and original researchers, just as in the musical community you find many good performers but very few good composers.

There is a continuum between science and philosophy. As Fichte said (but did not practice), philosophy should be the science of sciences.

Of course you cannot free yourself from the laws of nature; but the laws of nervous systems are not the same as the physical laws.

Even philosophies who have denounced pseudosciences like psychoanalysis, have condoned pseudoscientific economic theories like neoclassical microeconomics. It is far safer and easier to criticize Freud and Jung than to criticize Milton Friedman and Friedrich Hayek, because the latter are backed by political movements whereas the former are not.

From a historical viewpoint, religion is just a kind of superstition, and from a political viewpoint it is a tool of social control.

Whereas science elicits changes in order to know, technology knows in order to elicit changes.

We deem valuable whatever is likely to meet our needs or wishes (individual values) and whatever is likely to help protect or attain social goals (social values). However, this is not a dichotomy, for some individual values, such as truth, are needed to secure some social values, such as mutual trust, and some social values, such as peace, are required to pursue some individual values, such as good health.