I'm a discursive thinker, so quotation has played an active role in the structure and content of my books from the beginning.

The digital age is for me in many ways about temporal wounding. It's really messed up our ontological clocks. In the digital economy, everything is archived, catalogued, readily available, and yet nothing really endures. The links are digital encryptions that can and won't be located. That will have to be reassembled over time. It won't be exactly what it was. There will be some slightly altered version. So the book is both an immaterial and material artifact.

In the digital economy, everything is archived, catalogued, readily available, and yet nothing really endures.

At any moment I could give up, but I haven't because love for me is an indispensable structure for being.

Both cinematic culture and the culture at large have changed profoundly. We're now in post-cinematic digital culture, and the internet has obviously usurped movies, which are no longer central to our lives, at least not as a collective spectator experience.

Quotes are a way of acting out not just a text, and not just thinking, but the making of a text. The construction of thinking.

Love has been the ontological pattern for me. And also the withholding pattern. I am still on hold with regards to love. And the longer one is on hold, in suspense, on a search, the harder, paradoxically, it is to continue with a search.