The conclusion of design flows naturally from the data; we should not shrink from it; we should embrace it and build on it.

The first point one has to get straight in discussions like this, is that ID is not the opposite of evolution. Rather, it is the opposite of Darwinism, which says life evolved by an utterly unguided, undirected mechanism. If god directed the process of evolution, or rigged the universe to produce complex life, then that is not Darwinism - it is intelligent design.

The trap does not work until all the parts were there. The system itself doesn't work until you fit all of them together.

In many biological structures proteins are simply components of larger molecular machines.

The basic structure of proteins is quite simple: they are formed by hooking together in a chain discrete subunits called amino acids.

It was only about sixty years ago that the expansion of the universe was first observed.

As the number of unexplained, irreducibly complex biological systems increases, our confidence that Darwin's criterion of failure has been met skyrockets toward the maximum that science allows.