People who call themselves supporters of Israel are actually supporters of its moral degeneration and ultimate destruction.

To achieve respectability, to be admitted to the debate, they must accept without question or inquiry the fundamental doctrine that the state is benevolent, governed by the loftiest intentions, adopting a defensive stance, not an actor in world affairs but only reacting to the crimes of others...If even the harshest of critics tacitly adopt these premises, then the ordinary person may ask, who am I to disagree?

There is no western concern for issues of aggression, atrocities, human rights abuses and so on if there's a profit to be made from them

I think it only makes sense to seek out and identify structures of authority, hierarchy, and domination in every aspect of life, and to challenge them; unless a justification for them can be given, they are illegitimate, and should be dismantled, to increase the scope of human freedom.

You have 30% of the world unemployed, a huge amount of work, that needs to be done just rebuilding the society alone.

Most of what is done I think is to kept secret so the public won't know. The same is true of what Wikileaks exposed.

Around 2008 and again in 2013 NATO officially offered the Ukraine the opportunity to join NATO. That's something no Russian government is ever going to accept. It's right at the geopolitical heartland of Russia.