Science is essentially an anarchic enterprise: theoretical anarchism is more humanitarian and more likely to encourage progress than its law-and-order alternatives.

A Universal Good should reflect the reality of the individual benefits that are collected under its name, not the other way around.

The only principle that does not inhibit progress is: anything goes.

There is no "scientific worldview" just as there is no uniform enterprise "science" - except in the minds of metaphysicians, school masters, and scientists blinded by the achievements of their own particular niche... There is no objective principle that could direct us away from the supermarket "religion" or the supermarket "art" toward the more modern, and much more expensive supermarket "science." Besides, the search for such guidance would be in conflict with the idea of individual responsibility which allegedly is an important ingredient of a "rational" or scientific age.

Humane science must be adapted to the requirements of a balanced and rewarding life.

Science is an essentially anarchic enterprise.

The validity of usefulness, adequacy of popular standards can be tested only by research that violates them.