Having no purpose is the function of art, so somebody else can look at it and ask a question. Design is different - you're supposed to understand what's going on. You can be delighted by it, intrigued by it, but you're supposed to know it's a hot dog stand.

You can't say there shouldn't be marketing and (that) marketing is a bad thing.

When I paint I do a different thing than when I design. But both involve aesthetics, both involve thought, both involve planning.

I'm most proud of the fact that I get to keep growing.

Your name is Windows. Why are you a flag?

Design always has a purpose, art has no purpose. That's really the difference between them. Do I think one is better than the other? Absolutely not. I think they both fulfill functions.

I think Apple is a wonderful example of spectacular marketing and I love having my iPod. There are the naysayers who say that "nyah, nyah, it breaks" and I think "well, I don't like what Microsoft made..."