Ethics is knowing the difference between what you have a right to do and what is right to do.

The right to enjoy property without unlawful deprivation, no less that the right to speak out or the right to travel is, in truth, a "personal" right.

It must always be remembered that what the Constitution forbids is not all searches and seizures, but unreasonable searches and seizures.

These death sentences are cruel and unusual in the same way that being struck by lightning is cruel and unusual.

In fact, a fundamental interdependence exists between the personal right to liberty and the personal right to property.

For me this is not something that can be swept under the rug and forgotten in the interest of forced Sunday togetherness.

To force a lawyer on a defendant can only lead him to believe that the law contrives against him.