If you thought you were trying to find out more about it because you're gonna get an answer to some deep philosophical question...you may be wrong! It may be that you can't get an answer to that particular question by finding out more about the character of nature. But my interest in science is to simply find out about the world.

Have no respect whatsoever for authority; forget who said it and instead look what he starts with, where he ends up, and ask yourself, "Is it reasonable?"

As you know, a theory in physics is not useful unless it is able to predict underlined effects which we would otherwise expect.

The worthwhile problems are the ones you can really solve or help solve, the ones you can really contribute something to... No problem is too small or too trivial if we can really do something about it.

If you thought that science was certain - well, that is just an error on your part.

That is the logical tight-rope on which we have to walk if we wish to interpret nature.

As usual, nature's imagination far surpasses our own, as we have seen from the other theories which are subtle and deep.