I think that creativity depends on having sufficient indeterminacy around for a new pattern to arise up within it.

Contemporary science is based on the philosophy of materialism, which claims that all reality is material or physical.

At the moment of insight, a potential pattern of organized behavior comes into being.

Because a truly skeptical position would be a very uncertain one.

I think that the 'laws of nature' are also prone to evolve; I think they are more like habits than laws.

I'm talking about science on the leading edge, where it's not clear which way things are going be cause we don't know, and I'm dealing with areas which we don't know about.

The morphic fields include all kinds of organizing fields...: The organizing fields of animal and human behaviour, of social and cultural systems, and of mental activity can all be regarded as morphic fields which contain an inherent memory.