I'm talking about science on the leading edge, where it's not clear which way things are going be cause we don't know, and I'm dealing with areas which we don't know about.

Of the seven experiments, the ones that have been most investigated so far have been the pets. The dogs who know when their masters for coming home, and the sense of being stared at.

Matter is merely mind deadened by the development of habit to the point where the breaking up of these habits is very difficult.

If there is no randomness in the universe, then what do we mean by chaos?

In both religion and science, some people are dishonest, exploitative, incompetent and exhibit other human failings.

At the moment of insight, a potential pattern of organized behavior comes into being.

In practice, the goal of skepticism is not the discovery of truth, but the exposure of other people's errors. It plays a useful role in science, religion, scholarship, and common sense. But we need to remember that it is a weapon serving belief or self-interest; we need to be skeptical of skeptics. The more militant the skeptic, the stronger the belief.