The science of morality is about maximizing psychological and social health. It's really no more inflammatory than that.

Anyone familiar with my work knows that I am extremely critical of all religious faiths.

Religious moderation is the product of secular knowledge and scriptural ignorance.

Theology is now little more than a branch of human ignorance.

It is terrible that we all die and lose everything we love; it is doubly terrible that so many human beings suffer needlessly while alive. That so much of this suffering can be directly attributed to religion—to religious hatreds, religious wars, religious delusions and religious diversions of scarce resources—is what makes atheism a moral and intellectual necessity.

Human experience depends on everything that can influence states of the human brain, ranging from changes in our genome to changes in the global economy.

If someone doesn’t value evidence, what evidence are you going to provide that proves they should value evidence. If someone doesn’t value logic, what logical argument would you invoke to prove they should value logic?