Every generation renews itself in its own way; there's always a reaction against whatever is standard.

One usually understands the art of the past by applying the conventions of the present thus misunderstanding the art of the past.

The most interesting characteristic of the cube is that it is relatively uninteresting. Compared to any other three-dimensional form, the cube lacks any aggressive force, implies no motion, and is least emotive. Therefore, it is the best form to use as a basic unit for any more elaborate function, the grammatical device from which the work may proceed.

I believe that the artist's involvement in the capitalist structure is disadvantageous to the artist and forces him to produce objects in order to live.

The thinking of John Cage derived from Duchamp and Dada. I was not interested in that.

An architect doesn't go off with a shovel and dig his foundation and lay every brick. He's still an artist.

What the work of art looks like isn't too important.