Each time I see a split infinitive, an inconsistent tense structure or the unnecessary use of the passive voice, I blister.

There are drones flying over the air randomly that are recording everything that's happening on what we consider our private property. That type of technology has to stimulate us to think about what is it that we cherish in privacy, and how far we want to protect it and from whom.

Whether born from experience or inherent physiological or cultural differences...our gender and national origins may and will make a difference in our judging.

When I talk to kids, I often tell them, "I'm going to disappoint you someday. I won't be worth my salt as a judge if I don't render at least one decision that makes you unhappy. Because if I'm following the law - and I don't write them - there has to be some decision you won't like. Please don't judge any person by one act. Take from them the good and don't concentrate on the little things that make you unhappy." That's my approach to family and friends, too.

The idea of a commonwealth relationship is alien to most people but I think that's true generally.

As members of the judiciary tasked with intervening to carry out the guarantee of equal protection, we ought not sit back and wish away, rather than confront, the racial inequality that exists in our society.

I think that even someone who got into an institution through affirmative action could prove they were qualified by what they accomplished there.