It is obvious that humanity faces existential threats of a global nature. They are global in the sense that is not possible to deal with them unless we resort to global governance.

It is obvious, I think, that national democracy withers. This has to do with globalisation.

Are there any good arguments in defence of moral nihilism? I think not.

If two norms conflict, if they are mutually inconsistent, then at least one of them must be false.

The kind of values for which I was supposed to kill, such as democracy and national independence, were better served, I thought, through non-violent action.

We can be certain that, if there are conflicting views in different cultures, some of these views must be false. This may help us to transcend our own narrow cultural horizon.

It is obvious that humanity faces existential threats of a global nature. They are global in the sense that is not possible to deal with them unless we resort to global governance.