No Chess Grandmaster is normal; they only differ in the extent of their madness
I don't study; I create.
All obvious moves look dubious in analysis after the game.
The whole life with a wife is like an end game with two bishops of different colors.
Every time I win a tournament I have to think that there is something wrong with modern chess.
Sometimes I even say that I have surpassed Lasker in using psychology. How? Well, sometimes I use psychology with a portion of risk. That is something else, something that Lasker wouldn't allow.