I don't study; I create.
All obvious moves look dubious in analysis after the game.
The human element, the human flaw and the human nobility - those are the reasons that chess matches are won or lost.
As a rule, the more mistakes there are in a game, the more memorable it remains, because you have suffered and worried over each mistake at the board.
The only positive contribution to chess from Fischer in the last 20 years.
Sometimes I even say that I have surpassed Lasker in using psychology. How? Well, sometimes I use psychology with a portion of risk. That is something else, something that Lasker wouldn't allow.